| Outcome-Based Education:
Creating a Set of Learning Objectives
by Anita Duhl Glicken, MSW
Download
PDF version
For most courses eight to twelve general
instructional goals will usually suffice; for a brief unit of instruction
two to four may be sufficient. Using Bloom's Taxonomy of Educational Objectives1
, a framework of three major categories can be used to classify instructional
objectives. These categories include cognitive (outcomes involving intellectual
tasks), affective (outcomes involving feelings and emotions) and psychomotor
(outcomes involving performance skills). The cognitive and affective domains
have the most developed classification systems. The categories in these
domains are arranged in hierarchical order from simple to complex. For
example, the cognitive domain includes performance at the following levels:
knowledge, comprehension, application, analysis, synthesis and evaluation.
It is assumed that higher levels subsume and include all behaviors of
lower levels.2
The affective domain includes the following major categories in hierarchical order: receiving, responding, valuing, organization and characterization by a value or value complex.3
The psychomotor domain includes the following major categories, also in hierarchical order: perception, set, guided response, mechanism, complex overt response, adaptation and origination.4
Descriptions and examples of verbs for all three categories can be found in Tables 2, 3, and 4.
All objectives provided in Section II of this manual have been identified
according to the domain of learning and the performance level. For example,
the following objective is cited as representing the cognitive domain of learning at the synthesis performance level.
- Upon presentation of an adult patient's medical history and physical
exam report, the student will select an appropriate pharmacologic intervention
for diabetes mellitus that has not responded to diet and exercise, including
drug dosage, frequency, administration, side effects, and follow-up.
(Cognitive - synthesis)
Table 2. Major Categories in the Cognitive Domain of
the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives5
| Categories |
Description |
Verbs |
| Knowledge |
Recall of learned material |
Defines, describes, identifies, lists, matches, names, selects, states |
| Comprehension |
Ability to grasp meaning of material; interprets material |
Distinguishes, estimates, explains, gives examples, paraphrases, summarizes, interprets |
| Application |
Ability to use material in new and concrete situations |
Changes, demonstrates, predicts, solves, relates |
| Analysis |
Ability to break down material into component parts so that organizational structure is understood |
Breaks down, diagrams, differentiates, identifies, outlines, divides, separates |
| Synthesis |
Ability to put parts together to create a new whole i.e. a research proposal, speech, scheme for classifying information, formulation of new patterns or structure |
Categorizes, combines, creates, generates, plans, reconstructs , summarizes, reorganizes |
| Evaluation |
Ability to judge the value of material for a given purpose. Judgments based on specific criteria. Include conscious value judgments |
Appraises, compares, concludes, contrasts, criticizes, justifies, interprets, relates |
Table 3. Major Categories in the Affective Domain of
the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives6
| Categories |
Description |
Verbs |
| Receiving |
Willingness to attend to activities or stimuli |
Asks, chooses, identifies, names, replies, selects, uses |
| Responding |
Active participation, student not only attends, but reacts |
Answers, helps, performs, presents, greets, complies, assists |
| Valuing |
Worth student attaches to experience, object or behavior |
Completes, describes, follows, initiates, invites, shares, justifies |
| Organization |
Bringing together different values, resolving conflicts and building an internally consistent value system |
Alters, arranges, completes, defends, explains, prepares, organizes, synthesizes, adheres |
| Characterization by Value or Value Complex |
Value system in place that controls behavior; behavior is pervasive, consistent and predictable |
Discriminates, displays, influences, listens, modifies, questions, solves, acts, performs, practices |
Table 4. Major Categories in the Psychomotor Domain
of the Taxonomy of Educational Objectives7
| Categories |
Description |
Verbs |
| Perception |
Use of sense organs for cues--guide motor activity |
Chooses, describes, identifies, selects, relates, differentiates |
| Set |
Readiness to take a type of action |
Begins, responds, shows, explains, moves, reacts |
| Guided Response |
Early stages of learning a complex skill, imitates, trial and error testing |
Assembles, dissects, measures, organizes, sketches, constructs |
| Mechanism |
Learned responses are habituated, movements performed with confidence and proficiency |
Assembles, dissects, measures, organizes, sketches, constructs |
| Complex Overt Response |
Skillful performance of motor sets that require complex motor patterns, quick, accurate performance |
Assembles, dissects, measures, organizes, sketches, constructs |
| Adaptation |
Individual can modify movement patterns to meet new problem situation |
Adapts, revises, changes, reorganizes, alters |
| Organization |
VCreating new movement patterns to fit a new problem or situation based on highly developed skills |
Arranges, composes, constructs, designs, originates |
1Bloom, BS. , et al. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives:
Handbook I, Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc., 1956.
2Bloom, BS. , et al. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives:
Handbook I, Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc., 1956.
3Krathwohl, DR. , ed., et al. Taxonomy of Educational
Objectives: Handbook II, Affective Domain. New York: David McKay
Co., Inc., 1964.
4Simpson, EJ. The Classification of Educational Objectives
in the Psychomotor Domain. The Psychomotor Domain.. Vol. 3. Washington:
Gryphon House, 1972.
5Bloom, BS. , et al. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives:
Handbook I, Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay Co., Inc., 1956.
6Krathwohl, DR. , ed., et al. Taxonomy of Educational
Objectives: Handbook II, Affective Domain. New York: David McKay
Co., Inc., 1964.
7Simpson, EJ. The Classification of Educational Objectives
in the Psychomotor Domain. The Psychomotor Domain.. Vol. 3. Washington:
Gryphon House, 1972.
|
| Teaching Tip |
Change the media style on presentations every 10-15 minutes
to maintain student interest and concentration.
Randy Cupp
University of Washington PA Program
rcc1@u.washington.edu |
| Teaching Tip |
For small group learning, students enjoy an occasional
game, i.e., “Jeopardy” or “Trivial Pursuit,”
with various categories relating to whatever subject matter was
taught
Anonymous |
| Teaching Tip |
Each Tuesday the PA students may participate in a 90-minute
review of integrated didactic material taught over the past week.
Since its inception this year, 30 of 36 students elect to attend.
Jennifer Holycross
Butler University/Clarian Health PA Program
jholycro@butler.edu |
| Teaching Tip |
Consider holding a focus group after each quarter of classes,
in addition to individual course evaluations.
Randy Danielson
School of Health Sciences PA Program
rdanielson@ashs.edu |
| Teaching Tip |
Assign students to teach specific conditions and diseases
back to their peers as a component of their professional development.
Raylene Lawrence [PA student]
University of Washington PA Program
ril@u.washington.edu |
|